The Fallacy Of The Sowing Of The Miracle Seed Through Giving

In Section IIE paragraph 5, The Cape Town Commitment mentioned this :

5. Walk in simplicity, rejecting the idolatry of greed
The widespread preaching and teaching of ‘prosperity gospel’ around the world raises significant concerns. We define prosperity gospel as the teaching that believers have a right to the blessings of health and wealth and that they can obtain these blessings through positive confessions of faith and the ‘sowing of seeds’ through financial or material gifts. Prosperity teaching is a phenomenon that cuts across many denominations in all continents.
We affirm the miraculous grace and power of God, and we welcome the growth of churches and ministries that lead people to exercise expectant faith in the living God and his supernatural power. We believe in the power of the Holy Spirit. However, we deny that God’s miraculous power can be treated as automatic, or at the disposal of human techniques, or manipulated by human words, actions, gifts, objects, or rituals.
We affirm that there is a biblical vision of human prospering, and that the Bible includes material welfare (both health and wealth) within its teaching about the blessing of God. However, we deny as unbiblical the teaching that spiritual welfare can be measured in terms of material welfare, or that wealth is always a sign of God’s blessing. The Bible shows that wealth can often be obtained by oppression, deceit or corruption. We also deny that poverty, illness or early death are always a sign of God’s curse, or evidence of lack of faith, or the result of human curses, since the Bible rejects such simplistic explanations.
We accept that it is good to exalt the power and victory of God. But we believe that the teachings of many who vigorously promote the prosperity gospel seriously distort the Bible; that their practices and lifestyle are often unethical and un-Christlike; that they commonly replace genuine evangelism with miracle-seeking, and replace the call to repentance with the call to give money to the preacher’s organization. We grieve that the impact of this teaching on many Churches is pastorally damaging and spiritually unhealthy. We gladly and strongly affirm every initiative in Christ’s name that seeks to bring healing to the sick, or lasting deliverance from poverty and suffering. The prosperity gospel offers no lasting solution to poverty, and can deflect people from the true message and means of eternal salvation. For these reasons it can be soberly described as a false gospel. We therefore reject the excesses of prosperity teaching as incompatible with balanced biblical Christianity.

https://www.lausanne.org/content/ctc/ctcommitment#p2-5

Though the distorted grace message seems to be the main tenet of the hyper grace doctrine, the actual main message of claiming of wealth and health blessings through sowing of seed by giving generously to the church really enthrall the followers.

Allow me to show the fallacy of this sowing of the miracle seed.

Luke 21:1-4 NASB
And He looked up and saw the rich putting their gifts into the treasury. And He saw a poor widow putting in two small copper coins. And He said, “Truly I say to you, this poor widow put in more than all of them; for they all out of their surplus put into the offering; but she out of her poverty put in all that she had to live on.”

This passage clearly reminds us that our offering is only meaningful to God out of a genuine love for Him and not with any other selfish or covetous motive. In Matt 6:1-4, Jesus our Lord already told us that if our giving is to draw and gain recognition from others, our giving will not be acceptable to God. Jesus specifically said that the poor widow gave more than all of the rich that day. Obviously He was not referring literally to the physical absolute amount of money given. Jesus, in His omniscience, even knew the 2 copper coins were all she had to live on.

Jesus is watching intently on our motives for giving our offering today as well. Let’s be sure on this first fact that Jesus our Lord uses a different criterion to weigh our giving – on our hearts and on not our gifts – unlike the tangible criterion the world uses.

Similarly, Jesus weighs on our repentance and not on our works, or on the circumcision of our hearts and not physical circumcision pertaining to our response to the gospel.

What the poor widow put into the treasury was considered more than all the rich Jews put. So let’s be sure that it is not the physical amount Jesus weigh on but the right motive or attitude in giving. The poor widow gave out of poverty while the rich Jews gave out of surplus – contrasting extremes which our Lord always loved to use to illustrate His teachings. The only qualm I can see about the rich giving out of surplus in this incident is probably a nonchalant performance of duty and not an act of devotion, unlike the poor widow. Then consider this : how contemptible it will be if the rich actually give with a covetous heart that God will reward him or her with even more when he or she is already very well off !

Let’s look at the first fallacy.

Jesus would be wrong to commend that the poor widow gave more if this false teaching of the growth formula (growth of multiple fold to what one gives) is to be believed because the poor widow would gain the least among all who gave that day. The real motivation behind such call to sow miracle seed is to raise as much funds as possible for the church and this objective can only be achieved by stoking the greed in the members to give more in physical amount and be rewarded in kind by God. Pittance giving will be considered a nuisance to the fund raising exercise.

On the second fallacy, this false teaching promises deliverance from poverty for sacrificial giving to the church. If it is true, the poor widow should not remain poor all this while till Jesus saw her. If she was giving for the first time, it would be a first time jackpot hit and Jesus was not really omniscient to know. Definitely not the first time because she was a Jew and not young since she was a widow. And if she had been giving with such commendable attitude all this while, then why was she still poor ? Do you follow ?

When the rich gave, the gifts would not hurt them a bit for it would be a pittance of their surplus. But when the poor widow gave, she probably had to go hungry that day for that was all she had to live on. Hallelujah ! The poor widow was really wise to see that storing treasure in Heaven, and not on earth, would last. Her physical hunger was nothing compared to her hunger for God. That was an excellent act of devotion to God. Besides she had survived all this while on little showing she had no lack by the grace of God though she was poor.

Let’s emulate the poor widow in giving out of love for God instead of covetous motive.

Hating The Works Of Nicolaitans Is Commended, Not Censured

Rev 2:5
But you have this in your favor: You hate the practices of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate.

Though there was not much written record on the Nicolaitans, some believed it could be a heretical sect started by Nicholas, one of the deacons of the early church. Acts 6:5. Clement of Alexandria said this about their deeds : “They abandoned themselves to pleasure like goats, leading a life of self-indulgence.” It seemed to be a form of antinomianism. (http://www.gotquestions.org/Nicolaitans.html)

The church at Pergamum actually embraced the teachings of the Nicolaitans unlike the church at Ephesus. Rev 2:15. They got no commendation but only censure. Jesus our Lord warned them that unless they repent, they would face the judgment reserved for those who taught false doctrine. Rev 2:16; 19:15.

One thing is for sure : It was an abomination for Jesus our Lord which He hated. Jesus our Lord had warned that life does not consist in the abundance of possessions and that we should not live in dissipation. But modern day hyper grace teachers continually preach that abundant life is an abundance of every good thing in life to be claimed and enjoyed. While the hyper grace teachers need not stress in the wrong premise that their teaching gives a license to sin; their teaching in the “positive” premise that a Christian is once saved always saved and that they need not worry about sin anymore even if they do commit sin is as good as permitting sin.

If Jesus our Lord would commend us for hating the works of such heresy, let no believer condemn us.

Hear what our Lord further commended on our discernment and intolerance for wicked people who taught heresy in Rev 2:2-3 :

“I know your deeds, your hard work and your perseverance. I know that you cannot tolerate wicked people, that you have tested those who claim to be apostles but are not, and have found them false. You have persevered and have endured hardships for my name, and have not grown weary.”

The Student Pocket Money Ministry In 1998

In 1998, I had a nasty fall at home. I hit my head on the hard ground and I lost consciousness. When I regained my consciousness in the ambulance, I could not remember the accident at all. My skull was deformed showing the severity of the fall.
In the weeks of recuperation, I decided to take things easy and I went to Genting Highlands for a couple of days. I had another fall going headlong probably 30 feet down. As I went down, I thought this was it. Again, I survived without any injury, not even a scratch, by the grace of God.

That shook me thinking about the vagaries of life and how far I had backslided over the years.

I went back to a local church. The very first Sunday service I attended, my car was booked for illegal parking. Later I learned that the neighbours was always upset with such illegal parking and had reported to LTA.

I decided to visit the families living in the vicinity of the church as I saw the need of the church to build up rapport with them. Relations improved so much that they did not report illegal parking anymore.

I also noticed the poor neighbourhood which I felt the church could evangelize through social service. I approached the social assistance department of MCD, Ministry of Community Development , the predecessor of MCYS for the list of needy families in the vicinity of the church.

I explained that I could match donors from church giving monthly pocket money to needy students of poor families which could not qualify for the social assistance from MCD. The supervisor was so grateful for this scheme as she felt so sad for not being able to help this particular group. And the scheme was approved readily.

She gave me a list of needy families near the local church. I managed to match some 15 to 20 families with willing donors in the first 3 months.

And when we invited them to an evangelistic campfire in church for the first time, they gladly came.

Seeing this ministry was a bridge to evangelizing the neighbourhood, the church took over the ministry officially which I gladly handed over.

2 years later when the Straits Times started the same fund, I believe the local church stopped this ministry as not to duplicate the same effort.

ST

An Entrepreneur Is A Non-Conformist

In an earlier post on Wisdom Nuggets, I have shown going against predictably irrational behavior of the majority fueled by covetousness, one may ironically get the very results of what everyone is pursuing.

A disciple of Christ is a radical disciple. He refuses to conform to the world.  Even encountering storms in life, he will continue to trust in the promises of God.

Likewise an entrepreneur is a non conformist. In his earnest pursuit of the best value or solution for a given problem, he may go against conventional wisdom of the day. He strongly believe in his cause and persevere till he proves the effectiveness of the value or solution he has discovered.

Allow me to share some personal examples.

Once I was trying to introduce a new digital read-out into a market where the German brand was the most established. Most of the technicians were trained using the German brand of digital read-out in schools or training institutes. Conventional wisdom was that nobody would change to buy another brand regardless of the price. The German digital readout was sold for $ 3500 and the cost of installing it onto the machine was separate and cost another $ 1000 for the brackets and installment labor. Buyers could only take a hire purchase loan of 90% of the cost of the digital readout and not the brackets and labor cost. I decided to offer through the largest distributor of the machines in consignment a total package price of $ 2500 including brackets and labor. That would be a saving of $ 2000 and the buyer only needed to pay deposit of 10% of the total package cost which would be $ 250 and the rest could be covered by the hire purchase loan. But for the German brand, the buyer would need to fork out $ 1350. Within 2 years, the digital readout I promoted overtook the German brand to become No 1 seller in the market.

Once, I even made semiconductor chips with my brand name ANK (Anthony And Kenny). Conventional wisdom was that factories around the world would never buy such a high tech product from unknown brand names and unheard-of manufacturers. Creative Technologies and Aztech were 2 local companies which supplied 90% of the world’s demand for telephony cards – sound card and 56k modem rolled into one. They produced 1.4 million and 0.3 million cards per month respectively. Once there was a shortage of 4 semiconductors chips and one signal relay and Creative got most of the allocation from the suppliers leaving Aztech without any allocation. I was approached and I managed to turn on a relatively unknown factory in Europe to make these components for me and labeled ANK. At that time, the whole production in China for the signal relay was only 10,000 units a month and I needed 300,000 a month. I went to turn on the factories in Ningbo to get me this volume production. I had no knowledge of the manufacturing technology but that did not deter me to work out with the Chinese factories to produce such a relay which was manufactured in Japan at that time only.

Once when I was trying to introduce a new brand of washing machines into the crowded market here. All the distributors refused to promote seeing no particular advantage against the more superior Japanese and European brands. And I could not afford any advertising budget for these distributors as well. Conventional wisdom was to sell new entry brands at extremely low cost. I went to look for a large direct retail shop bypassing the big distributors. At that time, most brands retailed for $ 600 to 700 so I positioned my brand at $ 650 instead of selling really cheap though my cost to the retail shop was $ 250. That gave the retailer a cool $ 400 profit unlike the established brands which the retailer would get only $ 50 and the promoter at the shop would only get $ 5 for each machine sold. I ensured that the shop gave $ 50 as commission to the promoter and the machine had to be sold with gifts costing another $ 150. To the consumers, they would perceive a very good deal when they saw the gifts of Philips appliances costing $ 300. The promoter was so motivated to promote my brand because she would get 10 times more commission than selling other brands. We moved so many washing machines more against one European brand who had advertised over TV at that time.

Once I took over a failed food court from Kopitiam, a local chain of food courts at Lucky Plaza in Orchard Road. I turned it around offering SGD 2 for all meals from the stalls I owned while renting cheaply to other stallholders selling less popular food items. I got a different crowd of office workers from other food courts serving mainly tourists. It was a hybrid model of owning some stalls and renting out the rest. This gave economy of scale for the self owned stalls for labor and purchasing. Such hybrid model also kept all stalls running. Soon we had the big Filipino weekend patronage.

Hyper Grace And Kabbalah

Going through the several sermons of one hyper grace teacher with special emphasis on numerology and the hidden meaning, and the constant reminder to his followers that he is the only anointed one or among the select few with the given knowledge from God to the “true” meaning of Scripture, I am sure that Kabbalah mystical teachings are now being introduced in bits and pieces here and there to the hyper grace followers.

http://www.gotquestions.org/Kabbalah.html

By claiming to be the only anointed one or among the select few with the given knowledge from God to the “true” meaning of Scripture over the clear teachings of all before him, he has proclaimed that the Holy Spirit had taught no one over the centuries on the right doctrine and all were in error till he comes on the scene now to teach the “real” thing. How preposterous !

You may ask whether the whole false doctrine is an immaculate conceived deceptive plan or plain innocent error.

I believe it is the former. Whenever such hyper grace teachers build a certain “truth” with only one or two Scriptural verses, any serious Bible reader will notice the contradiction with the whole counsel of the Word of God. And whenever such error is pointed out, I have noticed that not only the subsequent counter-argument is terribly weak because it throws up even more error, but it also exposes a desperate attempt to make good the “truth” as biblical. So when we see such desperate attempt to fill up a pit by digging another pit with every subsequent weaker counter-argument, we know the false teacher is fully aware of the deliberate error he is introducing.

So why is the hyper grace teacher deliberately introducing error being fully aware it is against clear Scriptural teaching ? All for the sake of gain which the Bible called the Balaam’s error.

It is so interesting to learn from this Balaam’s story that despite knowing God was going to judge him through the word of a donkey, yet it did not deter Balaam from continuing his evil work for the sake of gain and he was eventually judged.

2 Pet 2:1-3,14-16.
But false prophets also arose among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing upon themselves swift destruction. 2 And many will follow their sensuality, and because of them the way of truth will be blasphemed. 3 And in their greed they will exploit you with false words. Their condemnation from long ago is not idle, and their destruction is not asleep… They have hearts trained in greed. Accursed children! 15 Forsaking the right way, they have gone astray. They have followed the way of Balaam, the son of Beor, who loved gain from wrongdoing, 16 but was rebuked for his own transgression; a speechless donkey spoke with human voice and restrained the prophet’s madness.

is

Another Enterprise Project

As documented in my book, The Coming Economic Flood, that as I did not know how to prepare for the coming economic crisis, the best preparation was to fulfill the Manifesto of Christ in sharing the gospel in word and in deed. As I went about galvanizing churches to share the Good News into unreached villages by meeting basic needs as a necessary bridge to entering these villages, I realized that the church clergy themselves were in need. And the quickest way to be self sustaining is to have farms breeding goats, chicken and cultivating rice and vegetables.

Some years ago, I introduced the EM (Effective Micro-organism) technology into such farm experiment. And I never expect it to be so successful today – truly by the grace of God for His tremendous blessing along the way.

The use of EM technology was initially used as an alternative to pesticides and fertilizers but it was expanded to treat water and to control the odor of waste in the farm.

http://www.em-la.com/what_is_the_em_technologyyy_en.php?idioma=2

Praise the Holy Name of our Lord God for His tremendous blessings.

IMG_6481 IMG_6482 IMG_6484

Putting On Christ

When we believe in Christ, His righteousness is imputed on us. Legally, God sees us as righteous in Christ because of His perfect atonement for our sins.  And He will continue His workmanship in us in training us to conform to Christ.

Rom 8:30.  And those he predestined, he also called; those he called, he also justified; those he justified, he also glorified.

There are two kinds of response to this training of putting on Christ or dressing up as Christ.  One is the sincere response of a true believer while the other is the insincere response which will put justification in Christ in doubt in the first place.

One is the hyper grace way. It is simply a wolf putting on the sheepskin of the Lamb of God and pretending to be a sheep. The wolf does not want to change his wolf ways and yet he enjoys pretending to be a sheep.

The other is the true grace way. One day, the wolf seriously want to be a sheep giving up his wolf ways. (This response to turn from its wicked ways is Repentance.) Yet it is a tough journey for he is still a wolf after all. But he can be a transformed wolf one day becoming truly a sheep in every sense and loving the sheep. The good kind of pretense is that the wolf starts by acting like a sheep living among sheep.

CS Lewis said this about pretense, “There are two kinds of pretending. There is a bad kind, where the pretense is there instead of the real thing; as when a man pretends he is going to help you instead of really helping you. But there is also a good kind, where the pretense leads up to the real thing. When you are not feeling particularly friendly but know you ought to be, the best thing you can do, very often, is to put on a friendly manner and behave as if you were a nicer person than you actually are. And in a few minutes, as we have all noticed, you will be really feeling friendlier than you were…”

But the wolf will realize very soon that he is not alone in this journey of the good pretense.

The Christ Himself, the Son of God who is man just like you and me, will actually be his side to turn his pretense into a reality.

You may suspect it is the conscience of the wolf helping him. If it is conscience, very soon, the wolf will realize he will get back to old comfortable ways he is familiar. And many “wrong” things the wolf does, his conscience will actually tell him it is perfectly okay because he is a wolf after all.

CS Lewis said this about the good pretense turning into reality with Christ at our side, “For you are no longer thinking simply about right and wrong; you are trying to catch the good infection from a Person. It is more like painting a portrait than like obeying a set of rules. And the odd thing is that while in one way, it is harder than keeping rules, in another way it is far easier. He is turning us into the same kind of thing as Himself.”

He is ‘injecting’ His kind of life and thought into us, turning us from real wolves into real sheep at the end of the day.

Convocation Speech At A Local University In 2010

A convocation speech in which I shared about entrepreneurship and extolling the virtue of applying the Pareto Principle to achieve contentment in life to the young graduands who were about to enter the next important phase of their lives.

Pro Chancellor or President
Graduands
Ladies and Gentlemen,

A very good afternoon to all of you.
First of all, I would like to thank Professor XXX and the University for this privilege and honour accorded me to give this convocation address.

I am delighted to be here to join you in this joyous occasion. I would like to congratulate you, the graduands, on your convocation. All your hard work has paid off today.

Congratulations !

Let us also recognize and thank all, especially your parents and lecturers, who have made sacrifices to help you in one way or another to achieve this important milestone.

A few of you may choose to continue your studies but many of you are about to enter this new phase of life which is the start of your career. I believe all of you have already given much thought about the possible direction to take.

Entrepreneurship is much encouraged today as the path to take and the benefits are well expounded and proven. Your training in this University has put you in good stead to be an entrepreneur in technical disciplines.

Allow me to share my personal journey to give you a head-start on this particular path and also to share one or two principles which have served me well all these years.

I realized early in my career that there is always opportunity to find an optimal cost effective and superior solution to a need, be it a product or service and make a profit in the process. Personally, I look at two approaches all the time.

One approach is to find a new superior product or service altogether, and the other is finding better value to offer in the entire value chain of making the product or providing the service.

For the former, it involves innovation of new products or services. For the latter, we know in every business organization, there is always these same necessary activity functions such as research and development, design, sales and marketing, production, customer service and distribution; and the entrepreneur can always strive to find better solution to enhance better performance in all these activity functions in the entire value chain of making the product or providing the service.

I believe everyone can have a shot at entrepreneurship by looking at these two approaches.

I will suggest working for a corporation for a start. With the experience gained in working in a particular activity function, it will be easier for you to search for superior performance in this particular activity function you are familiar with.

I tried the latter approach first by looking at the distribution activity function. Early in my career, I was employed in sales. After working several years in the sales and marketing function and with the experience gained, I was asking myself whether a local new company could provide better value add service in the distribution function for the foreign American or European enterprises willing to venture into Asia. Two or three decades ago, it was much easier just to be a pure distributor of American and European companies in Asia, but I preferred the company I intended to build in Asia would be part of a global partnership with foreign enterprise. I changed the simple distribution or agency model into a hybrid model of passing off the local company as a de-facto branch of the foreign enterprise in Asia. But in essence, it is still very much a locally majority or minority owned company.
The traits of an entrepreneur have been much discussed but there is one which I would like to stress here. And that is belief in the competitive edge or superior value one sees in the innovative product or service while others cannot. That is, the entrepreneur is a non-conformist.

When I was trying to promote my company as an one-stop provider of various products in one catalogue buying from various Japanese suppliers in the early 90s. The skeptics would discourage by telling me that the major customers would not be so dumb as not to buy directly from the Japanese suppliers. My belief was that the major customers would prefer to work with an one-stop supplier who could provide all products in one catalogue. It might seem to defy logic but it worked. I went on to build a global brand name in partnership with a foreign enterprise.

I have ever produced semiconductors and other electronic components under my own brand name without any capital investment in factory by outsourcing the manufacturing to foreign factories. Again, skeptics would say that no customer would buy semiconductor chips with unknown brand given the stringent qualification process. Again I proved them wrong.

For the former approach of innovation, one can look at licensing technologies from the universities here where there is a lot of research in various fields.

The world today is facing major problems in such areas as energy, environment and health care and we need innovative solutions in these fields. Our government has availed many opportunities in the form of grants to encourage both research and commercialization of ideas in these areas. That opens vast opportunities for all who wish to embark on this path of self employment. The jobs today are no longer “iron rice bowl” so to speak, and so entrepreneurship offers this opportunity of long term self employment as long as the enterprise built is a viable concern into the far future. One can also have the satisfaction of bringing tangible benefits to mankind.

Two years ago, I tried this innovation approach by licensing solar cell technology from a local university to make enhanced solar EVA films used in solar cells. I have yet to divest any equity in my firm with an initial paid up capital of $ 150,000 through a grant from Spring Singapore and a loan from a listed company . The firm now has commercially produced products just ready for adoption by the market.

There is one principle I would like to share which will serve you well into the future. Though we learned this principle in engineering, it could be applied to time management and even relationship. And that is the Pareto Principle or 80/20 rule.

It roughly states that 80% of the effects come from 20% of the causes. In business, 80% of the business will come from 20% of the customers. To try to increase a further 10% of the business from the majority of the balance 80% of the customers will expend a lot of your time and energy if every customer demands the same attention of your time and energy. And that is not very wise time management and your health and relationship will suffer as a result.

This principle should serve as a daily reminder to focus 80% of our time and energy on the 20% of our work that is really important. Don’t just work smart; but work smart on the right things.

You can also apply this principle to your personal finances. You will find 20% of the expense items make up 80% of your total monthly expenditure. It will be prudent management to trim the expenses of these 20% expense items. It is not wise to feel good just for a brief moment telling people that you stay in an expensive posh condominium or posh car if you are struggling and feeling the insecurity all the time about the mortgage or hire purchase. With the trimming of these big expense items, you will then have the extra to be generous in many other ways such as giving an allowance to your parents, or buying treats and gifts for your loved ones or those less fortunate. Remember Contentment, not Greed, will always bring you joy and peace in your lives.

I wish you success in your every endeavour. Thank you.

Pareto Principle

In the Bible, we read of how the judges and other heroes of faith gathered information, considered the possibilities, weighed the information, considered the trade-offs and opportunity costs, and then carefully made their decisions.

As we seek God’s kingdom and His righteousness first, many things will be given to us including wisdom which He will give generously when we ask. Matt 6:33; James 1:5.

Today, by the grace of God, I see some proven wisdom principles as the common grace of God and they are easily articulated and shared. I believe the Pareto Principle is one such wisdom principle which we will do well to adhere by doing first things first.

The Pareto Principle, also known as the 80–20 rule, states that approximately 80% of the effects come from 20% of the causes. Or more easily understood is that 20% of the causes produces 80% of the results.

The management consultant Joseph Duran popularized this principle and attributed it to an Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto.

This principle can be applied to many sciences and even many facets of life.

As a student, I studied only the 20% of the topics of each subject which are really important and true to form, 80% of the exam questions came from these 20% topics.

Later when I worked as a sales representative, I concentrated my sales effort on the 20% of the customer base which gave the company 80% of the sales and I consistently met or exceeded the job expectation.

Even in my marital relationship, I always remember to do those 20% most important stuff which will greatly please my spouse 80% of the time.

By doing the first things first, I will have sufficient time to perform most critical tasks without being overwhelmed or burned out.

I realized that I consistently met or exceeded the expectations through adhering to the Pareto Principle without having the pressure and consequent stress to excel to the very top.

When I graduated with second class honours (upper division), I was awarded one of the most prestigious postgraduate scholarship without being denied such opportunity by those who obtained first class honours.

When I started my career in sales, I did relatively well and by the age of 29, I was made the general manager of a branch office of a USD 1 billion Spanish conglomerate in Asia.

By adhering to the Pareto Principle for all tasks and decisions, we will have proper time management to perform most without the need to sacrifice other important facets of life.

pp

Predictably Irrational Behavior

You will notice that many will rush to buy their residential properties or cars during the good economic times and end up driving the prices exorbitantly high.

But when there is an economic recession, you will find prices so depressed and yet there is hardly any buyer.

There were 5 economic recessions in 1985, 1991, 1997, 2001 and 2008 in the last 25 years averaging one recession every 5 to 7 years. Should not one buy his first residential private property or car at the next downturn to take advantage of lower prices, saving more and taking a lower loan mortgage ?

I have seen this predictably irrational behavior for the last 25 years of many people buying their properties at the peak.

Perhaps they buy because of the confidence of holding on to jobs during good economic times. But the mortgage loans taken are usually of 25 to 30 years’ duration. They will still face the possibility of losing their jobs in the next downturn while the principal sum of their mortgage loan is relatively untouched because the first few years of mortgage installments go to paying interest.

I believe the main reason for such predictably irrational behavior is more of greed or covetousness  – the fear of losing out on good deals to others.

I started my career in 1985 and many of my peers were able to save enough to buy their first residential private property in 1994 after saving up the initial deposit of 20% or more. Most bought their first property between 1993 to 1996 at the height of the property boom taking a 25 year mortgage loan.

I decided to wait till the next downturn which happened in 1997. Because I waited out, while my peers would be paying on interest for their mortgage, I would be saving up more money.

So when the prices had gone down by 30 to 50% in 2001, I was able to purchase my residential property without taking any mortgage loan as I had saved up to 50% of the peak price in 1996.

While my peers continued to worry over their mortgage loan over the entire repayment period of 25 to 30 years, I have one less worry.

Should the private property prices stay high and I really miss the chance of owning a private residential property, I will not lose any sleep because I am more than content to have just a roof over my head in public housing.

Contentment indeed brings great gain while covetousness only bring anxiety as illustrated in the above example.